Home Articles Case Summaries Clear the Air
Klamath Water Users Protective Assoc. v. Patterson
203 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2000).

The Ninth Circuit denied Klamath Water Users Protective Association's (the Association) petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.[1] The Association had previously appealed the decision from the District Court for the District of Oregon which held that the Association was not a third party beneficiary to a contract between the United States Bureau of Reclamation and California Oregon Power Company. This contract controlled the operation of Link River Dam.[2] The Ninth Circuit amended its previous decision and added a footnote stating that its decision involved only the management of the Klamath Project and did not affect the pending Klamath River Basin water rights adjudication.[3]

 



[1] Klamath Water Users Protective Assoc. v. Patterson, 203 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2000).

[2] Klamath Water Users Protective Assoc. v. Patterson, 191 F.3d 1115, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999), amended and superceded by, 204 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2000), amended by, 203 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2000).

[3] Klamath Water Users Protective Assoc., 203 F.3d at 1176.

Post a comment

Your comment will need to be approved by the ELAW staff before it will appear. We appreciate your patience.

Search reviews:


Energy Cases

Case Categories
© Lewis & Clark Law School, 10015 S.W. Terwilliger Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97219